We're curious about: BEYONDFIT
Looking for Accurate Weather Forecasts? Click here.

Idea: bigfooticus and their babies e-book

Welcome to http:// bigfooticu .az.com

AZ AZ.COM 2011 ZORGIUM: The owner of the unique content which we abstracted has a web page that our search engine cached here. For your convenience, our search engine enhancement has rendered it script and pop-up free. Proceed from our abstracted version to the owner's website in our frame page when you have determined you have further interest. We've included a hyperlink above in blue that will take you to the original fully formatted article and sources when clicked. We've also included hyperlinks to alternatives below in blue. AZ.COM AZ Zorgium provides endorsement free abstractions.

These following stats are for our tracking and internal use only:
SiteClicks: 59%, SegmentsViewed: 65%, Weight: 93%
ForwardChainedVisitors: 89%, LinkBacks: 82%, VerControl: 1.18

IDEA Alternates: wehqelite jensafina zerodownim sitemanpro gallmighty millionvid newprof2 10000seeds oliveaxa massagebus craving 1ruckus altransisv eq365 kappadona offmychest tattooshad p4p50 purpose27 showergame
IDEA Favorites: judotechnique azbannerheroaz az-charlesjamessales-az azlearn4xiaz az-f2r1a1n3k6-az az-canbridge-az az-ebook-suppliers-az az-rentier-az jmalone azreunitedrelationshipsaz az-themoneytreebook-az urinbiz aznonpareil1az onlinehomesurveys

Abstract

Homo robustus
bigfooticus

Bigfooticus and Their Babies
As seen in USA TODAY
See first ever real infant photo. More info. below
They are NOT 1/2 apes, Gigantopithecus or Beasts -They are hominids
related to Lucy & us.
Anthropologist, paleoanthropologist & others - Please be responsible
- non-dismissive,
non-prejudicial, and open minded. ASK thoughtful
questions and take note.
New major discoveries of 6 living HRB young in 2008 & 09.
These are genuine ( hominin) hominid discoveries & science.
Not only do Miller's discoveries prove beyond any doubt that
Bigfooticus really do exist - but his many observations and
discoveries shed much light on who and what they are and how closely
" our living hominin kin " are related to us !
An actual photo of a The rest of Zuzu's body &
the bottoms
living Bigfoot-icus baby of her feet are in the books
1 st release

" Zuzu " clenches her teeth in fear ! without her
camoulflaging hair
First Bigfoot Baby closeup - 9 month old " Mona Zuzu "
discovered in 2008 by Tom Miller. What are we looking
at ?- See below:

Zuzu without her camouflaging hair. Bigfooticus
Baby skulls are shaped like
her head was tilted slightly downward the later
robust Australopithecines and
& her head & neck muscles were flexing early Homo genera
(genuses) with adult
& bottoms of her feet are human shaped. cranial size 2
X Homo habilis which
Her cranium is 40% that of an human infant. overlaps both
H. erectus & H. sapiens

skeleton day 1 adult skull viewed
robust fossil clavicle
from
above from ( d-site )
Miller has discovered where they go when they are cold ,
wounded,
sick or dieing & Where their skeletal remains may be found
!
Five ( 5 ) individual non-Sapiens living hominin Beings were
discovered in 2008 & a sixth
in 2009 by Tom Miller. Miller named them in order of his
discoveries : Infant Teddy,
Buddy, Zoe, infant Mona Zuzu , Clarence Oddbody & seven year old Tommy
Boy in 09.
Three years of quiet & careful study lead Miller to many other
Bigfooticus discoveries.
All supported by photo, moving video and other indisputable
paleoanthopological evidence.
Welcome friend & seeker of Bigfoot-icus understanding &
knowledge:
A Colorado conservationists has stumbled upon numerous major
discoveries over the last three years and wishes to share them with you
in a newly released 150 + page E-book. After contemplating
Veterinary School and the Colorado School of Mines, Tom Miller
entered the University of Colorado School of Engineering. Miller
graduated from C.U. with a diversified education background including
paleoanthropological studies of higher hominid & human evolution.
After college - he endeavored to persevere and expand his geologic
knowledge by working as a roughneck on an oil-rig etc. He is a
woodsman and in years past was an avid bow-hunter of large game.
Miller lives near many Wilderness Areas and a National Park .
He breeds 2,000 lb. Percheron draft horses on his farm and in the
1980's contributed to the recovery of the endangered California Condor
when only 26 birds existed in the world. These factors - combined with
a rounded background enabled Miller to be calm, rational and
open-minded when he made his first historic discoveries of five
Non-Sapiens living hominins in 2008. His first thought was " Wow-
They really are real ! " He quietly and methodically followed his
discoveries with a woodsman's senses & animal understandings which -
combined with his scientific hominid education - led Miller to many
more discoveries. He discovered his sixth non-Sapiens hominin Being
- ( an approximate seven year old ) in 2009. All six are supported
by photo, moving picture video evidence and other scientific evidence
- collected over three years. Many of Miller's discoveries dispel
many promoted misconceptions & responsibly shed new light on our
shy, timid, highly intelligent & NOW - closest known living kin.
Miller's cumulative discoveries have benefited our scientific
understandings
of our newly proven & described hominin kin - which he has dubbed
" Homo robustus bigfooticus " . His scientific hominin naming
is justified by the new fossil record , Miller's many new discoveries
& other cumulative evidence - (see robust Australopithecines @
Australopithecus boisei ) - which are more thoroughly explained in the
just released - as of 12 - 1 - 2010 limited time e-book.
No Risk E-BOOK Instant download Order Page
New- Just released 150 pg E-book. Low priced now at
Only $ 7.95
100% Privacy & Payment Secure order via ClickBank or Paypal.
Proceeds to promote hunter awareness to prevent accidental
shootings.
See: USA TODAY
Available via E-book for a limited time
We guarantee your reading and learning enjoyment or Your Money
Back.
Help Preserve ! Be informed !
Get your book in only seconds. Secure via ClickBank or
Paypal.

Click Here to Order & receive your E-book Now !
We guarantee that you will learn more about our cousins than all
other publications which falsely portray our hominin kin as 1/2
apes or beasts
( which they are not ) & you will gain new insights into our own
hominin past. Miller's new evidence indicates that they share near
99.9 % DNA with Homo sapiens. You'll be entertained by Miller's
discoveries & close encounter stories.
Our Privacy Policy: We respect your privacy
and will not sell
or rent your
e-mail address or other information.
60 day guaranteed reading satisfaction - or your money
back !
Instant readable access via your computer
once payment is confirmed via Clickbank.
Regular full price of non redacted e-book is
$ 29.95
This first release has some locations info. & photos
redacted for
their safety concerns etc. & thus ; you get an
Early Bird
LIMITED TIME SAVINGS of $22.00 or 73 % OFF NOW
!
That brings your total preservation price down to
ONLY $ 7.95
for your instant E-book - when you order NOW !
Contact us at BigfooticusBaby@yahoo

Click Here to Order your E-book Now
via secure ClickBank or Paypal

Allow a few seconds after click.
See more below !
____________________________________________________________________

* Home Page

BigFooticus

We bring hominids to life

California Condor

" Bigfooticus and Their Babies "
H. robustus bigfooticus
Today is 11-30-2010. First Full skeletal reveal
&
As seen in USA TODAY the
First ever close-up of a real
living 9 month old infant
" Mona Zuzu "
Book out with full body shots of Zuzu
Guaranteed learning and reading
satisfaction

" Mona Zuzu " Copyright 2010
Discoverer Tom Miller
Mona clenches her teeth in fear and flexes her enormous zygomatic
cheek, skull and neck muscles !
Full body shot of Zuzu including her feet
in the E-book.
Zuzu's brain size is 40% that of a human newborn yet her mother's
brain size is approx. 75 + % that of an adult human. Human brain
sizes
are near full size at about 4 1/2 years old whereas Bigfooticus
young
have near twice the time frame of skull and brain growth.
Notice how she flexes her head, skull and neck muscles to turn her
head.
Her zygomatics are very ROBUST Australopithecine (A. Boisei )
like.
She has a tiny chin and her mother has a more pronounced chin
than Homo erectus.

Zuzu is just the tip of the ice-burg of many real photo and
video images of several discovered real living Bigfooticus
young.
Close-up photo of an infant - 9 month old " Zuzu "
with her ROBUST Australopithecine (A. boisei) face & skull.
Her mixed anatomical comparisons to the genus Australopithecus
in shoulder width and arm lengths - versus her comparable torso
to leg proportions to the genus Homo and her mother's 1000 + cc
cranium which overlaps both Homo erectus & Homo sapiens.
Modern Human Homo sapiens averages 1350 cc -
brain sizes.
Homo sapiens neanderthalensis averaged 1480 cc
+/-
Homo robustus bigfooticus 1000
cc "
(Erect Man) Homo erectus 950
cc "
(Handy Man ) Homo habilis 700
cc "
Australopithecus boisei ( pre Bigfooticus ) 600
cc upper end
Australopithecus robustus " 550 cc
A.
africanus 500 cc "
A. afarensis ( Lucy )
430 cc
Bonobo
410 cc
Common Chimpanzee 400
cc
New instant E-book available !

with Guaranteed learning
and reading satisfaction. Check back soon.
Proceeds to support Preservation via
Hunter awareness.
NEW 150 + page E-book cover below

Homo robustus bigfooticus Homo sapiens
sapiens

Homo robustus bigfooticus ( fossil )
robust clavicle
Copyright 2010

Hominid Research
Biomechanics HRB
Please check back weekly to see the latest evidence updates.
Extra low priced e-book available soon on Miller's 6 (six) discovered
living HRB Beings aged 6 months old to 30 years old
corroborated by photo & moving video evidence etc.
Proceeds to benefit ( Hunter ) public awareness & to promote their
Protections.
Keep an open and flexible mind when it comes to hominid and hominin
evolution(s). We have only scratched the surface and several BIG
Homo robustus bigfooticus discoveries - which shed new light on
hominin reproduction behaviors & survival strategies - will soon be
announced !

See more at LivingHominids
& HomoRobustus
(c) (c)
Chimpanzee Bigfooticus
robust clavicle Asia to America

via many Beringias

during ice ages
c)
Africa to Asia to N.America Top view skull
skeleton day 1

Our goal is Species Preservation
& to make learning fun ! WE need your help !
Spread the word and tell your friends & colleagues
about our sites ! Real Bigfooticus will be grateful !
Contributions
Bigfooticus Conservation
Scientific or media P.O.
Box 1689
Contact request:
Longmont , Colorado 80502
Thank You - on their behalf !
Miller's prior conservation projects below
California Condor - Osprey - Owls
Also see more at LivingHominids
Hominid
Research
Biomechanics yum chicken

Hand raised Barn owl Note: Not a monkey Yum -
chicken 18 Hands 2000 lbs.
on Miller's farm but a
Chimpanzee
who shares
nearly 99 %
DNA with
humans.

Osprey w fish Baby & mother Father
delivers fish Two 1 ton stallions
on Miller's farm
Updated weekly
Add this to your favorites so you can learn the latest
HRB revelations while you drink your morning coffee !

lesson # 3
Neanderthal man
Supreme
Homo sapiens neanderthalensis
Lesson 3 near bottom
" Neanderthal depictions by paleoanthropologists over the years as
sub-humans without sophisticated language skills has been absurdly
illogical and prejudicial in their understanding of not only hominin
evolution - but animal communication abilities and evolution in
general. "
H. sapiens neanderthalensis man average brain size
1480 cc
H. sapiens sapiens man average brain size
1350 cc
They did get the Homo sapiens name on both shapes
correct.

A must see is paleo-artist John Gurche's accurate
first ever non-prejudicial rendition of a
Neanderthal man for the
Smithsonian Institution's hominin exhibit.
More on Neanderthal man near the bottom.

SEE Ookbert
You have already seen his skull in
USA TODAY and other publications.

HRB is dedicated to the entertaining study & education about our
hominin kin and the new near monthly discoveries across the
globe from the 4.4 million year old Ardipithecus ramidus
(Ardi ) through 3.2 million year old Australopithecus afarensis
(Lucy), their presumed descendants of Australopithecus africanus ,
Australopithecus robustus , Australopithecus boisei & the other
robust Australopithecines , Homo habilis , H. floresiensis, Homo
robustus bigfooticus TM and the many intermediate hominin
forms including Neanderthals - Homo sapiens neanderthalensis and
Homo erectus etc.

This site should be added to your favorites - so that
you can check back every so often, drinking your morning coffee to see
the latest discoveries, skeletal analysis of the bio-mechanics of the
various hominin skeletal structure comparisons to each other and to
modern Sapiens and the many other discoveries including habitats and
their distinctive and unique reproductive and survival strategies.

Stay tuned for our new adventures through time.

NEW Lesson # 4

UPDATE - As I mentioned last year and in my book - the rumored 300
lb. new ape species dubbed Bili Ape has recently been confirmed in
African jungles !
How could a 300 pound ape species be unknown & unconfirmed in our
densely human populated world all the way into 2010 ?
An ape which can not elude humans via bipedal locomotion as " our
living hominin kin " BIGFOOTICUS do.
Lesson # 1
Our first lesson will be about 3.2 million year old Lucy
Australopithecus afarensis
3.7 to 2.9 million years ago
( minimum- range)
Keep in mind - just because a fossil of a hominin shape
( presumptive species) has not been found outside the proven range -
it is highly likely that - that shape lived long before & long after
the known fossil samples as the probabilities of finding the
first or last individual of any shape (species) is probably almost
ZERO ! Rodents and other animals quickly recycle calcium. Watch how
quickly lions , hyenas and vultures quickly scatter the skeletons of
animals.

Fossils are hard to make and even harder to find.
Especially if you are looking in the wrong places.
Critical thinking is the key !
Question the stated " facts ".
Some scientists have lots of book learnin schmarts
but
have little experience with real animals or animal
behaviors.
Although Lucy has lost favor as a topic of discussion these past
few years, especially with the discovery of ( Ardi ) Ardipithecus
ramidus who lived 4.4 million years ago, she is very significant -
because - she turned the community of paleoanthopology upside down
when she was announced by Donald Johanson - who discovered her in
November of 1974. Lucy was named after the Beatles song - Lucy in the
sky with diamonds , which was being played over and over in camp -
when she was discovered.
Prior to Lucy - it was assumed that hominids (hominins) had to
have large brains before they could learn to walk on two legs (
bipedalism ). Forget the obvious fact that birds (dinosaurs) with
their birdbrains had been doing it for tens of millions of years. That
is why , prior to Lucy - there were many cartoons showing Darwin's
head on an apes body all hunched over and why most of the cave-man
exhibits throughout the world showed cave people bent over as if
their heads were full size and their bodies were catching up and
straightening out evolutionarily. We now know that the scientists
of the first 3/4 of the twentieth century were kind of silly in
their postulations - but at the time they had no hard evidence one way
or the other. That is one of the reasons why Lucy is so
significant. She got us on a more true path to understanding our
progress through time. Lucy had a brain roughly the same size as a
chimpanzee yet the rest of her skeleton was very similar to modern
human design. She was small, at three and a half feet tall &
weighed less than 80 pounds - but her slightly more curved hands &
the rest of her skeleton were used very much like modern Homo sapiens.
She was fully upright with basically a more refined Bonobos chimpanzee
type skull and with no larger brain than a modern chimpanzee. Her
feet were very similar to ours. Later on - came the discovery of
even older - footprints - in 3.6 million year old volcanic ash of
Laetoli which presumably showed - that two Lucys (Afarensis)
walked side by side & one of them was probably caring a
baby, as her footprints and stride appeared altered as if she
were caring a young one on her hip. The tracks next to hers
were larger and thus the inference is - that she had her mate
walking with her. If it was her husband walking with her, the
certificate has long since vanished.
More on Lucy later.
Lesson # 2
The short history of Paleoanthropology
is mostly not a good one.

In 1912 the Piltdown hoax was perpetrated by some unscrupulous
characters in England, one of the least logical sites for early
hominins to evolve. The stubborn scientific community took 40 years to
figure out that an ape jaw had been attached to a human skull even
though the hoax had been pointed out decades earlier. This led many
prejudicial scientist to ignore the true great hominin discoveries of
Africa. Many are just as prone to cultural, religious or self interest
prejudices and are in denial of the obvious today as scientists were
then. They have allowed inflexibility of mind to rule their reasoning
& ridicule with dismissive words - the great new discoveries that
debunk what they have been wrongly teaching over their careers. A
recent example is the dismissive language used by a
paleoanthropologist about the great discovery of Ardi (Ardipithecus
ramidus) saying : " That ain't the foot of a biped ", which
demonstrates that jealousies can permeate science discoveries too.
That ridiculing scientist obviously does not fully understand the
gradual processes of evolution. Ardi is obviously a biped. Ardi
was studied and analyzed for more than ten years before he was
announced to the world. Most people do not realize that this field of
study is as much interpretive art - as science - and more often than
not - the prognostications of the prognosticators have been wrong.

So keep an open and flexible mind when it comes to hominid &
hominin evolution(s). We have only scratched the surface & several
great discoveries which shed new light on hominin reproductive
behavior and survival strategies will soon be announced !
Since humans are the least densely haired great apes, it
should have been obvious that we evolved in a very warm, stable and
probably very humid environment as even deserts tend to get too cold at
night for our light hair covering. Our hair covering did not become
less because we invented clothing , clothing was created by smart
adaptable hominins who ventured outside their historic body comfort
zones - probably following game and other resources. Exposure to the
elements was obviously not enough of a selective factor (evolution) to
cause a large reversal in body hair denseness. It seems that the
most likely reason we retained lush head hair - is that our brains
function best with stable temperatures. Hair keeps the rain , sun and
both heat and cold out. What seems perplexing is why we did not
retain more hair on the tops of our feet and shoulders as sun shields.
Maybe the denseness of their jungle habitat sheltered them from
much of the direct rays of the burning sun.
Part of the problem is that scientists forget that before
humans with their stone or metal axes - the world was more densely
forested and the forest were much more widespread and had their
internal relative humidity helping to maintain their edges and
expansions or to preserve themselves (forests) from shrinking.
Another problem is - that dry areas today with their washed out
canyons and valleys - are favored by scientists because larger areas
can
be searched on foot and the bones can wash out and be exposed in the
sediment layers.
If a bone has traveled down stream or down hill- sometimes like
gold nuggets- it can be traced back uphill to their source and more
bones or more of the skeleton can be discovered. That is much harder
to do in jungles and it is much harder to excavate in jungled or
forested areas.
Even though the now desert areas where the searches occur today
may have been jungles millions of years ago, today's environment still
skews the search locations & thus the hominin skeletal evidence may be
very much skewed because of the selection of those search sites.

Our loss of hair denseness may have played a major role in our
brain developments and mate selections. That is a big unknown - as is
the hair denseness on many hominins ( so called species ).
We know ancestral humans at one time had dense hair covering -
as newborn babies still retain some of their strong hair grasping
instinct and grip for awhile.
The reason peoples tended to become lighter and lighter skinned
as they lived farther north is that a pale face can produce as much
of the essential nutrient - Vitamin D - via the suns exposure to the
skin as a whole body of a very dark skinned person. Thus over time -
the lighter skinned hominins who lived farther north or wore more
clothing, tended to be healthier than the ones who were not producing
enough vitamin D - and thus, on average - had an advantage in passing
along more of their genes. Therefore , over time - more northerly
tribal populations tended to become lighter and lighter skinned. It
has been shown that there is a connection between skin color, hair and
eye color gene expressions as well. Freckles and red hair are an
example. Darker skin is obviously more advantageous in warm - sunny -
southern climates.
Additionally; body mass of all animal species including humans -
tends to become larger the farther north they live. This is a function
of conserving or dissipating body heat and referred to as Bergmann's
rule. The extinct cave bear is a prime example. In between cold
glacial periods their body's shrank in mass and grew when the cold
returned. Growing and shrinking many times.

Before people moved around so much, about 1,000 or so years
ago, population(s) gene pools were much more effected and thus
reflectively expressed by their local environments. In steep
mountainous areas of the world , people of each village can tend to
have their own "look" as it is easier to find a girlfriend in your own
village where the people are friendly toward you - than climbing that
10,000 foot hill to compete with the neighbor village boys. Thus - in
small villages , many people are related to each other in some fashion.
Natural selection is still going on in the Human populations
today, it is just hard to gauge with the rapid population
explosion in the last few hundred years combined with other non
environmental factors.
Homo sapiens are likely the first hominins to have large
numbers. Neanderthals had 10% larger brains and lived side by side "
modern Sapiens " for an amazing 130,000 plus years - but they had to
contend with ice ages and harsh winters which no doubt - took a toll on
their overall numbers. Their young may have been less likely to
survive & adults more likely to become injured.
Their depictions by paleoanthropologists over the years as
sub-humans without sophisticated language skills is illogical and
prejudicial in their understandings of not just hominin evolution, but
animal communication abilities and communication and evolution in
general.
Supreme Homo sapiens neanderthalensis were the first known
hominins to bury their dead with what appears to be a belief in the
after life or possible religion. Their tool kits were superior to
Sapiens for tens of thousands of years. They were probably overwhelmed
by shear numbers after more than 100,000 years of holding their own.
That is a long time. Slight technological advantages by Sapiens
such as the Atlatl (spear-thrower), possible new diseases transmitted
by Sapiens and those shear numbers probably eventually overwhelmed
them. Some probably were also absorbed into the gene pool of Sapiens
and visa-versa , although their genes would likely be watered down by
now - unless those genes had a strong selective advantage.
A big article in Discover - the world of science in Sept. of 1995
expounds upon all the reasons why the two (so called) species could not
interbreed. Recent D.N.A. analysis shows just how presumptive,
irrational, illogical and prejudiced the scientific community can be
and how they can brainwash themselves to justify their postulations,
actions, mis-teachings and biased beliefs which are not based in
rational reasoning processes. If you ever hear a scientists or
paleoanthropologist use the word " far fetched " it is probably a
hint that they are covering their ignorance of a subject.
Lesson 2 1/2
A very few number of people have dominated and controlled the
interpretations and reporting of hominin discoveries in the last 50
years and the media has not been well enough informed to question the
many theories that have defied common sense. That is still ongoing. An
example of that was the "Single Species Hypothesis" promoted by
Professor Wol.... who had no proof and who must have never set foot in
a dense forest or jungle. His dominate teachings stated that two
different similar species could not live side by side for various
reasons. His many theories were and are not supported by science or
common sense. His absurd teachings were discredited decades earlier by
Darwin's discoveries of the many different finch species occupying
different niches in a relatively small area and - for hominins - by the
discoveries of Australopithecus africanus, Australopithecus boisei ( a
robust Australopithecine ), A. robustus and Homo habilis and A. sediba
living side by side and probably in harmony for hundreds of thousands
of years or more.
The depictions on T.V. of various hominin groups millions of
years ago in conflict with one another over food resources etc. is not
logical nor supportable either. The main conflicts and threats besides
injury or disease to hominins and hominids over those first millions of
years were likely predators, not each other. Big cats would probably
be number one - followed by hyenas, canids, crocodiles, snakes and
occasionally eagles.
Africa is a huge area with dense jungles and forests and has
many isolation barriers such as: the many large rivers which are a
great deterrent to movement. These barriers could keep many hominin
groups relatively separated from each other for thousands of years.
Their particular isolated niche of the jungle or transition zone or
whatever, may have favored certain teeth size and design and other body
part shapes for each group - for that particular time and climate in
history. That however; does not make them a new species. We have at
least five great ape species (including Sapiens) living today in
Africa and it is rumored that a new larger species of Chimpanzee may
exist. A new population of 1,000 very rare Bonobos has just been
discovered in Africa and announced to the world. Up until the last ten
thousand years - we five great ape species have lived in relative
harmony in Africa.
A minority group has tried hard in recent years to force their
prejudices about Australopithecines into the scientific and public
consciousness by trying to demote them to a genus called Paranthropus.
A more thoughtful and logical majority has pushed back and
re-established the Genus name Australopithecus. According to most
paleoanthropologists - A. africanus evolved into Homo habilis etc. -
who evolved into H. erectus - who evolved into H. sapiens
neanderthalensis and Homo sapiens sapiens etc. etc. Every time they
find a new shaped head or skeleton they like to give it a new species
name. " Homo sapiens heidelbergensis fifth and main streetensis ".
Genetic variability, which allows the driving forces of evolution to
work , doesn't enter their minds.
Or the fact: That all of these so called species could
interbreed and produce viable offspring , which is the scientific
definition and rational for species classification. There is no
logical proof that a Homo habilis and Homo sapiens could not breed
and produce viable fertile offspring. Their chromosome numbers would be
the same and their DNA would be about 99.9 % the same. It is even
logical to assume that late Australopithecines and late Homo are close
enough genetically to breed and produce not only viable - but fertile
and reproducable offspring.
Therefore: the scientific definition of species has long been
violated by paleoanthropologists and the art and science of
paleoanthopology. There is some room for excuse here though; as it
does make it easier for students to follow the evolution of the many
human (forms & shapes) through time. From Lucy to the present.
There is no definitive dividing line between
the Genus Australopithecus & the Genus Homo
Australopithecines are ancestral to Homo.
Remember : It is not like one morning - a mother Australopithecus
africanus - Mrs. Hatfield said : " Hey honey look - I just gave
birth to a Homo habilis - lets name him Adam and hey - the McCoys
are having a baby soon - maybe they will be blessed with a Habilis
too and can name her Eve . "
Evolution is a little more gradual than that and the fact that the
fossils which happen to be discovered - fall into a certain time period
and locale which may have influenced certain aspects of the Beings
bodies should not make one come to any conclusions that each different
shape is a new species that could not - some how - share its D.N.A.
with other hominins of different shapes given the circumstances.

There is no defining line between the Genus Homo and Genus
Australopithecus except the arbitrary findings of those fossils and the
presumptions and educated guesses of the scientists studying the teeth
etc. of those partial fossils. They have no logical proof that the
contemporary hominins over the last two and a half million years could
not interbreed given the right circumstances - as their DNA was
probably more than 99.9 % identical to each other for hundreds of
thousands of years.

Hominin population groups did not have to be replaced by other
invading hominins to change shapes as we have been misled to believe.

The forces of natural selection ( evolution ) were and are at work
on all the hominin groups throughout the world and their DNA is and was
near identical. Those similar evolutionary forces combined with the
sharing of DNA by close geographic groups caused all groups to continue
to grow - on average - larger brains and evolve body shapes which
suited their habitat.

Extrapolations can be done back through time. If Bonobos and
Chimpanzees and Humans share roughly 99 % of DNA and current estimates
of our divergence from each other are between 8 and 12 million years -
with probably 9 to 10 million years being a good starting point , then
each million years of divergence would extrapolate out to about one
tenth of one percent difference in DNA. Each one hundred thousand
years would be about 1/100 of one percent. If so called different
shaped species occasionally interbred for those hundreds of thousands
of years then that could drop to 1/1000 th of one percent difference in
DNA.
Hardly a new species.

If scientists dug up a Chiwawa skeleton and a St. Bernard skeleton
and were told one was one million years old and the other 900,000 years
old, no doubt - with the differences in skull crest jaw muscle
attachments and size differences - they would conclude that they were
two unique species. We know that those two breeds are separated by less
than a thousand years and a female St. Bernard A.I. ed by a male
Chiwawa will produce viable fertile puppies with features somewhere
betwixt the two breeds. Some Homo sapiens populations (races) have
been separated from each other for 100,000 years and yet have Zero
problem when together, of producing very viable offspring.
So WHAT'S THE POINT again ?
Different sizes (including teeth) & different shapes & proportions
of body parts are not always - indicative of different species !

Stay tuned & Check back soon !
Don't miss a week as some pictures and stories will be
posted for only a day !
The cookies will follow the crumbs.
Click on to LivingHominids
Remember to add this site to your favorites
We will be updating this site continuously.
Your friends at Bigfooticus
Lesson 3
Neandertal MAN
Homo sapiens neanderthalensis
Neandertal man is a prime example of said
preconceived prejudices by paleoanthropologists.
For decades they have been maligned as sub-humans and continue to
be - to this day for unfounded reasons. Their thin numbers in relation
to Sapiens were apparently absorbed or went " extinct ". There have
been some skeletal remains that appear to be crosses between Sapiens
and Neandertals.
Neanderthals had average brain sizes of 1480cc which were 10%
larger than so called modern Sapiens, who average 1350 cc. Even
Cro-Magnon man ( early European Sapiens) had bigger brains than current
humans. Paleoanthropologists usually call this 130 cc Neanderthal
brain size advantage"slight or insignificant" when comparing to us.
But it is guaranteed - that if the tables and figures were reversed,
those same scientists would all be expounding upon how
significant those extra 130 cc in brains are to Sapiens
superiority over Neandertals.
The facts are:
Neandertals lived at least 230,000 years ago to at least 24,000
years ago and 130,000 years of that time they lived next to or side by
side with Homo sapiens.
Their ROBUST (appearance) is a combination of evolving from
Homo erectus and the colder climate that they inhabited. Their low
density numbers probably reflected most other hominin groups throughout
most of history.
Sapiens might be the first hominins to live in large
communities with many families. The numbers game may be the prime
reason for our ultimate dominance. It may be a combination of many
factors that took 100,000 years for Sapiens to replace, absorb & push
Neandertals from their range. We humans speak in terms of 1,000 years
being a long time. Co-habitation of two differently shaped Sapiens
hominins (so called species) for 100,000 years is comparatively -
a very long time.
A decades long promoted
scientific ABSURDITY
For years the foolishness of many anthropologists, scientists and
paleoanthropologists have and continue to this day - to assume
that Neanderthals did not have sophisticated language - because for
many years they had not found hyoid neck bones (near Adam's apple)
with Neanderthal skeletons.
The hyoid is the only human bone that is free floating and is
not attached to another bone. Predators often go for the soft throat
and a loose bone could easily be dispersed or washed away etc.
The idea that humans all of a sudden "evolved"
a hyoid bone for speech out of thin D.N.A. air lacks common sense to
such a degree that those scientists - should have to retake
kindergarten science.
Now that several Neanderthal hyoid bones have been
discovered and are almost an exact match for Homo sapiens hyoid bones,
some reactive so called anthropologists now theorize that the reason
Neandertals appear to have gone extinct - is because their tongues were
fatter and placed differently in their throats allowing them to swallow
better, but which allowed them only half the sounds that we can make. "
GET A GRIP ! "
These non-scientifically supported, nonsensical prejudicial
postulations against our Neanderthal brethren; are stupendously
outrageous !
Even the great U.S. hominins (who are known to have mastered
speech) were overwhelmed by superior numbers at the Alamo, Korea &
Philippines in WWII ! Their tongues were not fat !
Neanderthal man had to contend with many ice ages whereby - the
sheets of ice that were created in those colder times reduced their
living area and their game's living area. Their prey would be effected
along with the plants that both Neanderthal man and the animals ate.
During the peak of those ice ages their ranges would be condensed
and the many winter survival stresses magnified. Warm centuries would
return and they could again expand their ranges with the newer,
stronger, more robust and smarter versions of themselves that made it
through the prior tough times.
H. Sapiens ; most of whom were living in Africa - did not have to
contend with those cold climates until the last 100,000 years or so and
thus could continue to increase their numbers without those intervening
periods of numbers constriction and contraction brought about by the
climate and severe winters.
So when you hear derogatory comments about Neandertals, remember
- Had the tables been turned - they might be showing skulls of those
ancient tall foreheaded hominins - who had wimpy skeletons - in their
schools with the teachers saying to their students:
" Obviously - Homo sapiens with their smaller brains probably did
not have the capacity for sophisticated language and thus - with their
skinny necks and tongues couldn't communicate with each other to get
out of the way of the moving glaciers". " That kids - is why those
melon headed beings are no longer with us today ".
At which point TrogloDan - the class clown - would
throw a spear into the chalkboard and be sent to the
Principal's cave.

Javascript must be enabled to view the Photo Album on this page.
Javascript must be enabled to view the Photo Album on this page.
Javascript must be enabled to view the Photo Album on this page.
Content copyright 2010 Tom Miller. All rights reserved.

Web Hosting Companies
Website Maker

End of Abstract

View Full Article

Find other ZORGIUM pages using AZ.COM:

Enter your search keyword(s) into the search input field of http://az.com
The zorgium specific results appear in the right hand margin.

Find other ZORGIUM pages using your favorite search engine:

Enter your search keyword(s) and the keyword "zorgium" into the search input field of http://bing.com, http://yahoo.com or http://google.com.

Heads up: There's an ongoing spamdexing of Google searchbot algorithms. Sites that are 'copies of copies' and cloaked sites which include Zorgium keywords presented to search engine crawlers yet garbage content presented to human visitors were hosted on thousands of IP addresses and domains registered immediately after the introduction of Zorgium in November of 2009. The Hostgator/'The Planet'/Softlayer datacenters in Texas seem to be the epicenter of this activity in conjunction with anonymously registered domains of various TLD's but primarily .info domains at Godaddy which, in our opinion, has some sort of connection to the domains of goldmint.in and goldmint.org. Google has begun to notice this and has begun to lower the ranking of these sites and put our original sites back on top of the search rankings. These actions, as far as we can tell, negatively impact the use of the keyword 'zorgium' as a search term and provided little benefit, if any, to the perpetrators.

ZORGIUM note to content providers: If you don't want your page to appear in Zorgium's search abstraction then put an exclusion for "Zorgium" in your web server's robots.txt file.

DISCLAIMER: Zorgium is a free world-wide-web engine from AZ.COM. You may use it, but by doing so you agree that your use of other people's information discovered via our website is entirely your responsibility. Enjoy!